The datafarm PR offensive against The Social Dilemma is well underway. Here's an example, written by Antonio Garcia-Martinez:

pullrequest.substack.com/peopl

Garcia-Martinez wiggles, denies, misrepresents, strawmans, and focuses on trivia. He dismisses datafarm critics as luddite outsiders who don't understand tech, a talking point the film-makers anticipated by mostly interviewing former (and current) datafarmers. He compares their comments to Cultural Revolution "struggle sessions" (?!?), and claims they're just cynically monetizing their insider status while living in luxury. Which ironically, is exactly what he does:
antoniogarciamartinez.com/

Show thread

@strypey The argument lying at the heart of this article is the same argument that Cory Doctorow makes in his dumb booklet attempted-take-down of Zuboff's The Age of Surveillance Capitalism:

That advertising does not work on people at all, and that people are not in fact influenceable by organizations and messaging.

Prepare to see a large tranche of society to dig their heels in on that blinkered belief over the next coming years as the problem of algorithmic influence at scale continues to get worse.

@strypey I agree with you. I was disappointed on reading Masnick’s techdirt piece. It’s fine to critique the film but he does so in a completely unhelpful way

@strypey I see only two decent criticisms buried in there: (1) the lack of criticism of Netflix (When Tristan Harris speaks about the "attention economy" in other contexts he often brings up Netflix, but did not do so in th TSD), and (2) the lack of actionable solutions presented other than "put down your phone." But these shortcomings of the film don't invalidate its premise.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon - NZOSS

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!