Yet another reason not to use 's proprietary video conferencing service. They care more about their public image than their users' security, and lie about trying to silence security researchers doing responsible disclosure with hush money:
proprivacy.com/privacy-news/da

There are a number of hosted or self-hostable alternatives, including , as well as conferencing apps like , and protocols like .

@strypey isn't it normal for security researchers to basically go "give me 50$ or i'll tell everyone there's a bug"

Follow

@icedquinn no. The article talks about how responsible disclosure and bug bounties are supposed to work. TL;DR public disclosure, with a delay to allow fixes to be applied, is the norm.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon - NZOSS

This Mastodon instance is provided gratis by the NZ Open Source Society for the benefit of everyone interested in their own freedom and sharing with others. Hosting is generously provided by Catalyst Cloud right here in Aotearoa New Zealand.