> I don't think the theory said anything about whether they'll contribute back
The pitch was that the corporate sector would fund most free code development (though there would still be hobbyists/ students making unpaid contributions). The argument was that talking about software freedom would scare them off and prevent that. Turns out that despite "open source" becoming the standard term, not-for-profit entities (including co-ops) still fund far more free code dev than for-profits.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!