That said, Wilber set an Indiana Jones worth of discursive booby traps for his critics here, even describing some of them in the text:
I've read one rejoinder that blunders into every one of them. One example, Wilber predicts a phrase he uses in jest will be quoted out of context as proof of what a dick he is, totally ignoring the point he made in that section, and so it is. The way he plays these critics like an orquestra, and their total blindness to it, is hilarious.
The methods Wilber used in that post, explained in more detail in a follow-up:
... also explain - a decade before the fact - essentially how a narcissistic TV celebrity became President of the USA:
"... the aim of polemic is to propagate a message through a particular population that otherwise wouldn’t lift a finger to help it. But they can’t stop talking about it, and thus up go the sales and out goes the message ... "
"Especially the more rage and indignation it arouses, the more it activates the shadow elements of those who get their feathers ruffled and have their buttons pushed. The polemical message is like a virus that propagates through the shadow elements of those who despise it."
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!