#ShowerThought to have even some of the software freedoms when using someone else's computer as a server, you need to be able to see not only what #FreeCode software the server is running, but the exact source code for the software running on that particular computer. Is there a way to apply the concept of #ReproducibleBuilds to binaries and scripts running on a remote server?
@strypey if the server owner wanted to silently introduce modifications to the code, even with reproducible builds they'd have many ways to do so.
For example, you can't check if the booted kernel is the same that one in a VM's /boot, and the kernel could be modified to patch binaries when they're being loaded.
So if the server owner is malicious, you've lost anyway.
And if the server owner is not malicious, that means when they say "it was build from this source code", you can trust them that it was.
What am I missing?
@strypey you fundamentally need to trust that the server is being honest that the binaries it's runs correspond to the source code.
if you trust the server then reproducible builds can help, because we can build a binary from source and compare.
> we can build a binary from source and compare.
That's my understanding of what reproducible builds means. But what if we didn't need to trust the server? Is there a way servers could expose copies of the binaries they're running for comparison, without compromising their security?
Just spitballing here. It seems to me that serverless apps only cover some user needs, and currently the only way to know if you can trust a server is to run it yourself, or know the people who do.
@alcinnz @rain for sure. It's become such an ingrained habit that I even see #OpenSource projects that could easily be desktop clients built as "cloud" software, presumably so the developer has something to charge for (the hosted service). OTOH take something like #Loomio, I guess you *could* build a #P2P version, but it would be incredibly complicated to keep everything in sync. I would like to see federation between Loomio servers though, so a user on Loomio.org can join groups on Loomio.foo.
I think the options are (?):
1. Trust the remote service; send it data it can read.
2. Don't trust the remote service; send it data that it can't read.
3. Don't trust the remote service; don't send it data.
For 2, there's very little profit motive in free-hosting data you can't read, therefore you don't get those services available as casually. Zero-knowledge services (eg https://github.com/fincham/paste or https://github.com/PrivateBin/PrivateBin) do exist.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!