Star Wars editorializing 

I just watched a "preview" version of the Han Solo prequel. This is IMHO the best film since Ep.7 (spoiled only by a certain prequel character turning up at the end for no good reason). didn't do anything to make me care about any of its cartoonish characters, and ... well ... almost nothing in the plot made sense and it suffered from some *major* prequelitis, but it was ... OK. If I can, I'll pay money to see on a big screen.

Star Wars editorializing 

@strypey
I seem to have enjoyed Rogue One more that you did.

Star Wars editorializing 

@SlowRain it wasn't as bad as the prequels. That's about the best review I can come up with. Nothing (except for the digitally vandalized originals) is worse than the prequels. Even Ep. 8 looks good compared to that bloated mess. But come on, how many times did we have to see shots of that lookout guy on Yavin, and all the other tiresome ? *yawn*

Star Wars editorializing 

@strypey
I actually like the prequels (with the exception of III) better than VII & VIII. I really don't like this new direction they're going with the main series. The anthologies, even the mediocre Solo, are more enjoyable for me.

How would you rate the Star Wars movies?

Star Wars editorializing 

@SlowRain see the huge rants I've been posting here ;) The movie nerd in me likes the idea of the . I've proposed trying this to my brother (also a "genre film" obsessive) when we're next in the same city, using the despecialized originals (the specialized versions are as bad as the prequels because of all the added ), and a truncated fan edit of 2-3.
nomachetejuggling.com/2015/12/

Star Wars editorializing 

@SlowRain my personal spin on the Machete Order would add after Ep 6, and then Ep 7. Questions, 1) did you watch the original trilogy with or without the pre-prequel digital tack-ons ("specialized" or "unspecialized"), 2) if you first saw the prequels as a child, have you rewatched them as an adult?

Star Wars editorializing 

@strypey

I watched them all as they were released: original series, special edition, prequels, and now sequels & anthology.

I read a bit of that Machete Order thing, but discount it. It's release order for me.

As for ranking them, best to worst, here's mine:

5
Rogue One
4, 6
2, Solo
1
8
7
3

Can I ask how you would rank the movies?

Star Wars editorializing 

@SlowRain

9 (I live in hope, and it would be such a massive save by JJ!)
1 (despecialized)
3 (despecialized)
7 / Solo/ 5 (despecialized)
8
R1 (had a lot of the narrative/ character fails of the prequels but at least got the aesthetic)
A prequels fan edit that cuts them down to one decent movie
3
2
1
Specialized versions of 1-2-3

What make Empire and R1 so much better for you than 4 and 6, and what didn't you like about 3?

Star Wars editorializing 

@strypey
Ep. 5 & Rogue One had more emphasis on character & there was more of an emotional connection. It's hard for a novel or movie to get a reaction out of me, so I appreciate it when one does. They also had more thought-out plots, even if Rogue One was a bit rushed.

Ep. 3 was utter tripe. Anakin's conversion to the dark side was thin (& poorly acted). The whole plot was just a collection of loose ends that needed to be tied up in a haphazard way.

Star Wars editorializing 

@SlowRain agree about 5 too, but I have to say I find it hard to understand how you can describe this way. For me, R1 had the broad strokes of a solid plot, but totally failed to take the time required for characters development, in their rush to get to the big 'throw in every piece of tech we've ever seen into one battle' climax. I didn't care when characters died in that battle. I still didn't know who they were enough to care.

Star Wars editorializing 

@SlowRain to this day I struggle to remember all the main characters' names, and I've seen it 3 times (out of curiosity, how many can you name without consulting or ?). I've seen twice, and I can at least tell you the first name of every character that has one (clearly stated in dialogue that is). I cared when Qi'ra was left behind on Correlia. I cared when Val and Rio died. When Has shot Beckett, I felt vindicated an conflicted along with him.

Star Wars editorializing 

@SlowRain as for the plot, the pacing had some serious issues (see rush to final battle as already mentioned). The writers can't help what we already know (from 1-6), but they don't have to give away what few mysteries there could have been. That prologue scene would have been more effective, narratively and emotionally, as a flashback when Jyn sees her father on Eadu. Up to then, she could have been using only her first name, never revealing her parentage to us.

Star Wars editorializing 

@SlowRain the whole plot would have worked better if it gave us more time watching the characters interact, and get to know and trust each other. That way we get to know them too, rather than just watching them wander through an endless series of Bang! Crash! set pieces (Kidnappings! Explosions! Tentacled, mind-reading creatures who have no effect on the outcome! More explosions!)

Star Wars editorializing 

@strypey
Regarding R1, names aren't important to me. I watched Molly's Game a couple of weeks ago & can only remember Molly & Player X (the latter one for obvious reasons). Yet I loved that movie. I can remember the names Finn, Rose, Rey, Phasma, Kylo, Maz, Poe, Haldo, BB8, from 7 & 8, yet I despise those movies. (That may be because there is a lot more discussion about the main series online than there is about R1, so I see those names mentioned more often.)

Star Wars editorializing 

@strypey
I agree about the opening of R1, though. It was horribly rushed. A good example of how not to do things. But, once it hit its stride, it seemed to carry its own (I've only seen it once when it was first released). I think we knew who everyone was, what they were doing, & why. It seemed to be good adventure story-telling from that point on. I don't think the characters are any worse than the original series or Solo. They were certainly better than the prequels.

Star Wars editorializing 

@SlowRain for me, 's ending is as bad as its beginning. The characters mostly vanish into a maelstrom of every single piece of tech used in every movie ever. It's hard to care when they all die, because it happens so fast, the movie never pauses to mourn them, not even for a beat. The final scene with Vader crashing through rebels to get at Leia's is forced and surplus, we've seen that already at the start of Ep 4. The movie could have had a stronger ending.

Star Wars editorializing 

@SlowRain the second act was by far the strongest. After they leave Jeddha and that irritating Che Guevara guy buys it (*finally*!), and before the battle of Scariff, where we're at least starting to find out who the characters are, and how they fit together with the world, and each other. With a bit of a prune, and some nurturing, it could have been a great film, but for me, it was just ... OK.

Star Wars editorializing 

@strypey
I haven't watched the 2 YouTube videos you mentioned, and I probably won't. I'm just interested in this discussion with you.

I also am not interested in any fan edits, machete orders, or or even Lucas's own special editions. I just stick to the original versions in the order they were released.

Star Wars editorializing 

@strypey
I want to start with a post you made midway through this last discussion about Luke's arc.

I actually don't think Luke (or any Star Wars character, for that matter) is a well-developed character. They are adequate for the adventure genre, but not in any way well-developed. Some are poorly developed (Anakin, Finn, Kylo, Poe, Qi'ra<--although she's at least likable). Most characters, like Luke & Jyn, are serviceable.

Star Wars editorializing 

@strypey
Yes, I missed mentioning Luke coming to terms with his father who is on the dark side & his own possible flirtations with the dark side because I feel that was just window dressing. It wasn't delved into in any meaningful way. They could've done more with that, but didn't. I'd say glossing over that is par for the course for the original trilogy & the anthologies. Not a sin (like the prequels & sequels), because there is something there, just not well-developed.

Star Wars editorializing 

@strypey
I'm not trying to belittle Luke. He's my second-favorite character after Han. I'm fine with people resonating with Luke, Han, Jyn, Rey, Rose, Leia, or Obi-Wan because they are all serviceable & have something worthwhile about them. Actually, the sacrifice made by the entire R1 team probably elevates them to worthy status as well.

Star Wars editorializing 

@strypey
What can I tell you about R1 characters? There was Jyn & the guy with her (you said Cassian). There was a droid (K-something). There were the two guys from the Jedi temple (one was blind: "I am one with the force, & the force is with me"). I'd forgotten about the pilot (until you reminded me). There was the really cool villain (you said Krennic). There was Saw. And Vader, of course. All of them serviceable. And I've only seen the movie once a year & a half ago.

Star Wars editorializing 

@strypey
What I remember about R1 is the faith, hope, & sacrifice of the characters. I remember each of them could've walked away. I remember the villain was cool & Vader was the most bad-ass we've seen (if a little incongruous). I remember it brilliantly explained a "hole" in the death star--which doesn't even need Ep. 4 to understand why it's important. And, it was Star Wars-y, like the originals, and the most emotional since Ep. 5. And by far the most meaningful.

Star Wars editorializing 

@strypey
I don't see where Solo is any superior to R1 as far as characters. I can only remember their names because I saw the movie recently. They'll fade, too, if I don't watch it again.

I'll take a cool, absolute "type" any day over a poorly developed "character". If the writer can't get the "character" right (Anakin), it's best not to even try. Just stick with a "type" like Jyn, Cassian, or a blind quasi-Jedi instead. Or Luke, Han, or Leia (or Indiana Jones & Bond).

Star Wars editorializing 

@strypey
Re: Ep. 7 not having anything new, that's a relative term. You only listed a few things that it copied from Ep. 4 & 6. It copied much, much more. The sequels are the least creative from a story & world-building point of view. And, like I said previously, if the writer isn't going to write a "character" or "type" properly, best not even attempt it (ie. Finn & Phasma; but Kylo & Poe are pretty bad, too).

Also, I'm not obsessed with race or gender; they're people.

Star Wars editorializing 

@strypey
I like the character of Qi'ra per se, just that I wanted more development of her & their story. There was too much going on in Solo: his introduction, meeting Chewie, the train heist, meeting Lando & winning the Falcon, the Kessel run, Beckett & Dryden Vos. The character (& the actress) deserved so much more. I'm not being harsh, I'm wanting more. She was so good & their story so compelling that she deserved a larger focus, hence a separate movie. #MoreQiRa

Star Wars editorializing 

@strypey
I'd like to see a trilogy of Solo movies. There was a trilogy of Han Solo novels decades ago (also a trilogy of novels about Lando). And I think Alden Ehrenreich is signed for 2 more. But, I agree, a sequel looks iffy.

And, I just want to reiterate, she is a "great addition to the Star Wars Canon". #MoreQiRa

Star Wars editorializing 

@strypey
Back to R1 for a bit.

The ending with Vader, incongruous as it is with his character in Ep. 4, & the transition to Leia is the perfect setup to the opening of Ep. 4. I've seen a YouTube video which mashes them together, & it is about as perfect as Star Wars gets. Gives me goosebumps watching it because we (now) understand the sacrifice & the hope.

Star Wars editorializing 

@strypey
A fair point about Jyn being the child of the scientist, but that doesn't lessen her character. The writing was still consistent with how something like that would play out. Real-world spy agencies & criminal organizations use any angle they can: lover, family, friend. It works. And, kudos to them for not playing it as yet another secret family member.

Star Wars editorializing 

@strypey
I'm mostly OK with Vader in R1, with the exception of his badassery at the end. It makes Ep. 4 a bit of a letdown just because we see so little of him, but Ep. 5 & 6 are OK again.

Yes, Krennic was good, & heaps better than Hux. Dryden Vos was serviceable in Solo.

Follow

Star Wars editorializing 

@SlowRain Vader doesn't actually do anything in that moves the story forward in any way. His presence is just pointless , and it steals the thunder from Krennic, whose status as the primary villain of the story is undermined, by seeing him get pwned by a much scarier villain half way through the film, who then only turns up again at the end, and again, only for fan service.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon - NZOSS

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!