Listening to an AU interviewee on RNZ talking about the "lost of services" related to the Facebook block on AU use... it highlights how blindly dependent so many organisations in AU are on FB and how they *shouldn't be*. It's their own fault. FB cannot and should not be depended on. It's foolish for community organisations and gov'ts to do so.

Gov'ts and civil society cannot afford to be dependent (as they have very foolishly allowed themselves to become, worldwide) on a handful of US multinational tech corporations. The problem isn't FB's action - it's the fact that Gov'ts are up-in-arms about it because they've got all their eggs in the Facebook basket. I pity them their lack of comprehension (I've been warning our gov't about this for 20+ years) and the deleterious effect it has on all of us.

@lightweight even Britain isn't quite as bad; some govt departments and public services do use Birbsite rather too much for shorter real time info (I noticed this when trying to find road safety info during the snow/ice a week ago) but they do at least still all have their own independent websites and keep them updated with longer articles/info publications..

@vfrmedia @lightweight they all do that too, its just nice to also have it on Facebook to spark discussion

@LovesTha @vfrmedia by all means they should use FB... as a distant secondary distribution vector, not primary.

@lightweight @LovesTha @vfrmedia People who want to broadcast to the masses will go primarily wherever the masses currently are. So that's Facebook. Anything else will be a distant secondary.

@bob @LovesTha @vfrmedia but they can't reach *all* the people that way, nor can they require it, because FB is technically a user-hostile platform running a foreign jurisdiction, answerable to a sometimes hostile gov't... (US Cloud act, Patriot Act, etc.). As a matter of principle, NZ's democratic processes should *only* be framed by entities beholden to the NZ gov't, and, ideally, not private parties with vested interests.

@lightweight @bob @LovesTha @vfrmedia Ideally perhaps, but this has never been how governments actually worked, even prior to the internet.

Follow

@bob @LovesTha @vfrmedia the reason we have a democracy is so that people who know how to do things better can, if sufficiently motivated, influence the system. This is an area where we have to both declare the status quo unacceptable, and provide a better alternative (which I think we can and even have done).

@bob @LovesTha @vfrmedia because if there's an ideal we're not yet attaining, then it's on us, as voters and participants in the democracy who know better than those currently managing (or not) the process, to use legitimate means to move us towards that ideal.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon - NZOSS

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!