Listening to an AU interviewee on RNZ talking about the "lost of services" related to the Facebook block on AU use... it highlights how blindly dependent so many organisations in AU are on FB and how they *shouldn't be*. It's their own fault. FB cannot and should not be depended on. It's foolish for community organisations and gov'ts to do so.
Gov'ts and civil society cannot afford to be dependent (as they have very foolishly allowed themselves to become, worldwide) on a handful of US multinational tech corporations. The problem isn't FB's action - it's the fact that Gov'ts are up-in-arms about it because they've got all their eggs in the Facebook basket. I pity them their lack of comprehension (I've been warning our gov't about this for 20+ years) and the deleterious effect it has on all of us.
@lightweight even Britain isn't quite as bad; some govt departments and public services do use Birbsite rather too much for shorter real time info (I noticed this when trying to find road safety info during the snow/ice a week ago) but they do at least still all have their own independent websites and keep them updated with longer articles/info publications..
@bob @LovesTha @vfrmedia but they can't reach *all* the people that way, nor can they require it, because FB is technically a user-hostile platform running a foreign jurisdiction, answerable to a sometimes hostile gov't... (US Cloud act, Patriot Act, etc.). As a matter of principle, NZ's democratic processes should *only* be framed by entities beholden to the NZ gov't, and, ideally, not private parties with vested interests.
@bob @LovesTha @vfrmedia the reason we have a democracy is so that people who know how to do things better can, if sufficiently motivated, influence the system. This is an area where we have to both declare the status quo unacceptable, and provide a better alternative (which I think we can and even have done).
Even though it isn't a primary place for government disseminate information it is a primary place many find new information. Cutting them off suddenly isn't good.
Facebook can be more reliable than government services in an emergency, this isn't good, but it is hard to get governments to invest sufficiently in server capacity for those events.
@LovesTha @vfrmedia here in NZ, I'd disagree. The gov't could engage local providers who are every bit as competent as FB... and they have resources *in the NZ jurisdiction* not exclusively outside of it, like FB. If we lose our 4 overseas cables, connecting us to the world, our coms are goneburgers. Not good risk management.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!