“Has anyone started having discussions with their CIO/CEO about moving back to an in-house mail server? I advocate for it” https://www.cbronline.com/opinion/microsoft-outage Heh heh. Yup.
@lightweight Mail servers are the last thing I think should be in house. Having a badly configured mail server for a few days can lead to years of mail delivery problems.
(This is advocating for contracting someone to run it for you, not to stick with MS)
@lightweight note my experience is in the small end of town.
@lightweight I do think we could do with a fix for email.
And it isn't like we don't have a replacement for email already. We have so many replacements for email launching every month.
@LovesTha well, yes, email is a technology for an earlier, quainter time. The lack of in-built encryption is a problem. But its distributed model is crucial. Centralised services are exactly not what we need...
@lightweight There are modern solutions to distributed models. (we are using one right now, not an email replacement, but the distributed model of it could be used)
@LovesTha Indeed - messaging build on the Matrix open standard shows promise, as does the ActivityPub standard. Both have a variety of excellent implementations, all open source.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!